Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Nov 2009 16:13 UTC
Windows Microsoft's Professional Developers Conference is currently under way, and as usual, the technical fellows at Microsoft gave speeches about the deep architecture of Windows - in this case, Windows 7 of course. As it turns out, quite some seriously impressive changes have been made to the very core of Windows - all without breaking a single application. Thanks to BetaNews for summarising this technical talk so well.
Thread beginning with comment 395173
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by Gone fishing
by Gone fishing on Wed 18th Nov 2009 05:14 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by Gone fishing"
Gone fishing
Member since:
2006-02-22

I was just quoting the article - However, my point is I don't think its just multiprocessor support that makes Vista dog slow. I use it on a dual core and it’s awful.

Folk complained about ME, compared to Vista ME looks like a good deed in a naughty world - admittedly the underlying technology in Vista might have been a step forward but the user experience is miserable.

MS apologists might like to say Vista isn’t that bad – if you run it on a quad core with 8 gig of ram it’s OK – it isn’t it’s awful something that MS will soon wish to forget. If MS had any decency they would make upgrades from Vista to Windows 7 almost free.

Reply Parent Score: 2

nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26

Or those that aren't vulnerable to tech group think.

Vista vs XP on an EEEPC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXw7v1bxpSs

I ran this test several times off cam and in some cases XP beat vista and in other cases Vista beat XP by a small margin. There was no consistent differential in score. In this particular video XP just happens to beat Vista by a few points. Overall Im surprised at how well the 900 handles Vista's overheads compared to XP

Reply Parent Score: 2