Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Nov 2009 17:11 UTC
Linux Now this is one to ponder. This year, the Nobel Peace Prize went to Barack Obama, president of the United States. The prize has been given to both politicians and non-politicians alike, and Keith Lofstrom thinks its time to hand over the Peace Prize to a non-politician once more: Linus Torvalds.
Thread beginning with comment 395664
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by kap1
by kap1 on Fri 20th Nov 2009 17:19 UTC
kap1
Member since:
2006-05-12

hey why not give it to Richard Stallman ;)

Edited 2009-11-20 17:19 UTC

Reply Score: 17

RE: Comment by kap1
by SANGEKi on Fri 20th Nov 2009 17:48 in reply to "Comment by kap1"
SANGEKi Member since:
2006-11-30

They should.
Would at least make more sense then Linus Torvalds.

Edited 2009-11-20 17:49 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 9

RE[2]: Comment by kap1
by nagnatron on Fri 20th Nov 2009 18:01 in reply to "RE: Comment by kap1"
nagnatron Member since:
2009-09-24

Yeah, why not give it to a guy who eats foot cheese and bashes anyone not agreeing to his dogma. Go Stallman!

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[2]: Comment by kap1
by jgagnon on Fri 20th Nov 2009 18:03 in reply to "RE: Comment by kap1"
jgagnon Member since:
2008-06-24

There is very little "peace" in Stallman's message, unless, of course, you agree with him completely.

Reply Parent Score: 9

RE: Comment by kap1 - shouldn't that be
by jabbotts on Fri 20th Nov 2009 18:58 in reply to "Comment by kap1"
jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06

Shouldn't that be RMS/Linus?

Reply Parent Score: 14

cerbie Member since:
2006-01-02

You got a +1 from me.

I can't count the times I'm looking for something esoteric, hit mailing lists archives of projects (including the kernel, GTK, mplayer, etc.), and out of nowhere, as someone mentioned the word Linux, or their distro's name, Stallman swoops in (like he had an automated search set up for this stuff), and does his several-sentence spiel about GNU being first, and the basis of the system, and so it should be referred to as GNU/Linux.

Ugh!

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: Comment by kap1
by BallmerKnowsBest on Sat 21st Nov 2009 16:06 in reply to "Comment by kap1"
BallmerKnowsBest Member since:
2008-06-02

hey why not give it to Richard Stallman ;)


They tried to, but he's boycotting the Prize because they sent him the details in a Word document and refused to change the name to the "GNU/Nobel Prize."

At least, that's the way he tells it. My suspicion is that the organizers saw this video and were afraid of what Stallman might do during his acceptance speech:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I25UeVXrEHQ

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE: Comment by kap1
by deathshadow on Sun 22nd Nov 2009 02:41 in reply to "Comment by kap1"
deathshadow Member since:
2005-07-12

Oh HELL no, I can see it now:

I'd like to just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as the Nobel Peace Prize, is in fact, GNU/Peace Prize, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Peace prize.

Let's leave the nutjob OUT of this one. Hell, I'm still waiting to find out that Stallman is actually Alan Abel in disguise.

Edited 2009-11-22 02:43 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Comment by kap1
by psudobuddha on Mon 23rd Nov 2009 19:00 in reply to "Comment by kap1"
psudobuddha Member since:
2009-11-23

the only thing i would give him is a hard way to go. all he does is act like the dictator of open source and i would rather deal with the MS Vatican rulership than the GNU SS Hitler.

Reply Parent Score: 1