Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Nov 2009 21:39 UTC
Internet Explorer "Many wonder why Microsoft doesn't offer nightly builds - or at least something fairly frequent - of Internet Explorers. Ars talks to Microsoft's general manager for Internet Explorer, who says the IE9 development cycle will look much the same as previous versions. We don't think that's a great idea."
Thread beginning with comment 395720
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: ...
by edwdig on Fri 20th Nov 2009 22:30 UTC in reply to "RE: ..."
edwdig
Member since:
2005-08-22

Is it _really_ Microsoft’s intention to literally spring IE9 as surprise on companies and developers and expect them to 'clean up the web' in an incredibly short time


Not at all. That's part of the reason they release preview & beta builds every few months. By the time they get near the end of the development cycle, things aren't changing that much.

The problem is IE is integrated into the OS, and lots and lots of software is dependent on it. They're not going to release a build into the wild that hasn't had heavy regression testing. Releasing nightly builds would be a support nightmare, both for MS and other developers.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: ...
by robojerk on Sat 21st Nov 2009 05:53 in reply to "RE[2]: ..."
robojerk Member since:
2006-01-10

The problem is IE is integrated into the OS, and lots and lots of software is dependent on it. They're not going to release a build into the wild that hasn't had heavy regression testing. Releasing nightly builds would be a support nightmare, both for MS and other developers.

That's nonsense. There's no reason why MS can't build IE to have parallel installations for non release builds. I think it would actually be more beneficial for them to seed pre-releases that can install in parallel.

Reply Parent Score: 2