Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Nov 2009 14:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 395967
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Click through to WSJ
by TemporalBeing on Mon 23rd Nov 2009 18:36
in reply to "Click through to WSJ"
Both links look the same, but from Google I got the whole story and only a paragraph from wsj.com. It's their own site and they made this loop hole on purpose and they leave it there while Murdoche is spouting all this nonsense. I used the same browser, so even if it was a cookie or something from Google, then I should have still got the second story for free, but wsj.com is allowing the story for free if you are referred by Goggle.
True - I on the links - I opened both, and from OSNews.com got just the first paragraph. Then took the title of the article, and went to google and search for it with the 'site:wsj.com' qualifier - and got a link to the full article[1] that nearly matches what was provided here.
Now, my guess is that WSJ.com gets a referral fee from Google - e.g. $0.05/click or something. So they are probably getting something from Google or they wouldn't have done it. Just a guess though as to why there might be a difference. That is basically what happens with Googles Adwords and other related advertising click-throughs.
[1]http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125898768560860537.html




Member since:
2006-07-16
Last year was it that Murdoch made the Wall Street Jouranl a pay site again? You can read the first paragraph for free, but need an account to read the rest. Unless you followed an link from Google, then you get the whole story for free. I decided to test this for myself to see if it was true, and is seems to be.
From Google News I got this story;
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125898768560860537.html?mod=WSJ_hpp...
From http://online.wsj.com I got this;
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125898768560860537.html?mod=WSJ_hpp...
Both links look the same, but from Google I got the whole story and only a paragraph from wsj.com. It's their own site and they made this loop hole on purpose and they leave it there while Murdoche is spouting all this nonsense.
I used the same browser, so even if it was a cookie or something from Google, then I should have still got the second story for free, but wsj.com is allowing the story for free if you are referred by Goggle.