Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Nov 2009 14:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 395983
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-08-22
True - I on the links - I opened both, and from OSNews.com got just the first paragraph. Then took the title of the article, and went to google and search for it with the 'site:wsj.com' qualifier - and got a link to the full article[1] that nearly matches what was provided here.
Now, my guess is that WSJ.com gets a referral fee from Google - e.g. $0.05/click or something. So they are probably getting something from Google or they wouldn't have done it. Just a guess though as to why there might be a difference. That is basically what happens with Googles Adwords and other related advertising click-throughs.
[1]http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125898768560860537.html