Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Nov 2009 00:06 UTC
Microsoft Microsoft has delayed the open source release of their Windows 7 USB/DVD tool, which contained GPL code. "As you know, Microsoft recently committed to making the source code as well as binaries for the Windows 7 USB/DVD Tool available this week, under the terms of the General Public License v2 as described here. While we worked extremely hard to try and get the code ready for release by today, we still need to test and localize it. Our goal is now to release the tool in all languages on the same day in the next few weeks. We appreciate your patience and understanding as we work to make the Windows 7 USB/DVD Tool available once again."
Thread beginning with comment 396034
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Redeeman
by Redeeman on Tue 24th Nov 2009 00:31 UTC
Redeeman
Member since:
2006-03-23

why do they need to stability test it? they should release the EXACT code used to create the binaries they distributed before, no less, no more..

Reply Score: 3

RE: Comment by Redeeman
by sukru on Tue 24th Nov 2009 01:27 in reply to "Comment by Redeeman"
sukru Member since:
2006-11-19

That "exact" part may not be there. The tool probably contains some extra code, which MS cannot open, and replaced quickly.

This happened with other open source releases in the past (i.e.: Java).

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE: Comment by Redeeman
by umccullough on Tue 24th Nov 2009 01:58 in reply to "Comment by Redeeman"
umccullough Member since:
2006-01-26

why do they need to stability test it? they should release the EXACT code used to create the binaries they distributed before, no less, no more..


Well, basically they've violated the GPL...

So it looks like they're *trying* to make good with the original GPL authors and release a work-a-like tool based on the same source code at this point.

The end result is that they still violated the GPL, but in a goodwill effort, intend to provide something similar based on the same GPL code instead.

For all we know, the company they outsourced the original project to has "lost" the code... meaning that Microsoft may have to re-create everything from scratch now as they were the ones caught violating the terms of GPL by releasing it to the public.

All speculation on my part, of course.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by Redeeman
by Redeeman on Tue 24th Nov 2009 02:24 in reply to "RE: Comment by Redeeman"
Redeeman Member since:
2006-03-23

I realize that, what im trying to do is expose their decietful half-compliance....

Reply Parent Score: 1