Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Nov 2009 00:02 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 396092
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-24
what drivel.
So I guess its a draw, hm?
As if the evaluation of their marketing would have anything to do with what the software actually is and how it works in the end.
The first page of rage is also useless, a section on why it is not open-scource likewise. 95% of people run their browser on an OS that is non open to start with, and nobody cares whether IE is open. Get over it you little FOSS nazis, there is open and closed, just pick.
I didn't even know you can share data on Facebook, other than pictures, in that you 'publish' them there. Plus, of course 200 million FB users can be wrong, because neither is FB a very bright thing as such, nor are the users the brightest, splurting out drivel about their useless private lives nobody wants to know
Also, I probably make use of only a fraction of the functionality of any software, but that does not mean the software is doomed only because the features are there anyway. What was that article about again? I couldn't figure.