Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Nov 2009 17:28 UTC, submitted by waid0004
Thread beginning with comment 396230
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Who freakin cares about the OS
by darknexus on Wed 25th Nov 2009 01:52
in reply to "RE: Who freakin cares about the OS"
RE[3]: Who freakin cares about the OS
by sbergman27 on Wed 25th Nov 2009 02:06
in reply to "RE[2]: Who freakin cares about the OS"
Sure, they can use a blacklist, but that is an inherantly reactionary approach.
That certainly hasn't stopped Norton and McAfee from from becoming insanely popular. Perhaps they'd be willing to sell a monthly subscription service to a proxy that would protect you from all that bad stuff. As everyone knows, studies show that malware exists for Chromium OS. And once it becomes as popular as Microsoft Windows, its security problems will be just as bad.
Don't allow your family to fall victim to such online identity theft, leaving you, your wife, and your children destitute and on the street. Purchase your subscription now at this special monthly rate.
Edited 2009-11-25 02:07 UTC




Member since:
2006-12-22
This said Microsoft about Windows 98.
We really care, just for sake of how will be oriented the attacks. Moving the attacks from OS to a higher level like a web-page which supposedly will be easier to be tested. Also Google have the knowhow to use a blacklist-whitelist just to block most of those attempts. Or at least I just hope they will!