Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Nov 2009 21:53 UTC
Legal We've got some progress in the other legal case Apple is involved in. The California case, Apple vs. Psystar, is more or less a done deal, but the Florida case, Psystar vs. Apple, is only just beginning. As it promised it would do, Apple has now asked the court in California to either dismiss the Florida case, or transfer it to California. Apple is also asking for a permanent injuction against Psystar. Through this motion, we also gain some juicy insight into Psystar's sales projections - and more interestingly, how many machines the clone maker actually sold.
Thread beginning with comment 396677
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

Thus in order to sue you have to prove damage of some sort.


Funny, then, that Apple specifically retracted its claim for damages... Only now that they have won, they reignite the damages claim.

Shouldn't that be impossible in a court of law? I mean, retract a damages claim only to bring it back once you know you've won? That's like making a bet where you can wait for the outcome before making a commitment.

Reply Parent Score: 2