Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Nov 2009 21:53 UTC
Legal We've got some progress in the other legal case Apple is involved in. The California case, Apple vs. Psystar, is more or less a done deal, but the Florida case, Psystar vs. Apple, is only just beginning. As it promised it would do, Apple has now asked the court in California to either dismiss the Florida case, or transfer it to California. Apple is also asking for a permanent injuction against Psystar. Through this motion, we also gain some juicy insight into Psystar's sales projections - and more interestingly, how many machines the clone maker actually sold.
Thread beginning with comment 396685
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
NOW it's clear
by BallmerKnowsBest on Fri 27th Nov 2009 00:43 UTC
Member since:

In the past, I've asked why the Apple fanboys are so throughly-incapable of grasping the difference between purchasing software and pirating it (based on their constant attempts to spin the Psystar case as if it were about software piracy).

But after reading the statement from Apple, I now understand: even the people RUNNING Apple are apparently too stupid to understand the difference (or just too dishonest to acknowledge it).

I guess I shouldn't be surprised, since the common iApologist doesn't have a single idea in his head except direct quotes from Apple marketing copy.

Reply Score: 7