Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Nov 2009 21:53 UTC
Legal We've got some progress in the other legal case Apple is involved in. The California case, Apple vs. Psystar, is more or less a done deal, but the Florida case, Psystar vs. Apple, is only just beginning. As it promised it would do, Apple has now asked the court in California to either dismiss the Florida case, or transfer it to California. Apple is also asking for a permanent injuction against Psystar. Through this motion, we also gain some juicy insight into Psystar's sales projections - and more interestingly, how many machines the clone maker actually sold.
Thread beginning with comment 396705
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Probably because...
by shadowhand on Fri 27th Nov 2009 05:34 UTC in reply to "Probably because..."
Member since:

... obviously huge funding source with no explanation ...

This is the part that I am really curious about. How can Psystar afford to face Apple in court not just once, but twice? Assuming the financial documents are correct, Psystar should be bankrupt at this point.

Honestly, the case itself is not very interesting and it was obvious what the outcome would be, but the case of where Psystar's money comes from... that is interesting indeed.

Reply Parent Score: 1