To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Which is why the ppc G4, which was very low-power and efficient, kicked the arse of Intel or AMD in its performance to power consumption ratio? Yes, Core2 and Athlon-64 were faster in terms of raw computing power, but they sucked up a hell of a lot more energy too. I've yet to see an X86 chip that can match the power-to-performance ratio of the ppc, Atom is a joke by comparison.
An ARM desktop might be nice for some uses, especially when Cortex A9 comes around. Current ARM chips, however, seem a bit under-powered for what many people use their desktops to handle. Curent ARM chips would be ideal for netbooks or other small devices. They're powerful enough to handle mobile computing and yet use very little power making battery life amazing.





Member since:
2008-07-01
Hurrrr. I wish someone would do a new Power/PowerPC desktop machine.