Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Nov 2009 22:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 396932
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You have to spend $150+ on an Intel CPU for a general case improvement. Even in an area where power is expensive (idle is much better w/ i5), they aren't looking shabby at all. S3 helps alleviate the idle power problem, too.
It's much more than Intel and AMD have vested interests in x86, to the point that nothing else has been able to keep a good foothold. ARM could prove to be proper competition; but with Apple, and not IBM, truly backing it, PPC was dead, regardless of any technical merit chips built using it may have or have had.
Edited 2009-11-29 16:56 UTC
RE[6]: Comment by strim
by BluenoseJake on Sun 29th Nov 2009 17:24
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by strim"




Member since:
2005-08-11
All the really important features of current CPUs, AMD had first. Multi-core? AMD had it before Intel. On chip memory controller? AMD had it before Intel. AMD had Hypertransport years before Intel had CSI (and that's just on Nehalems). They even broke 1Ghz first, back in the day.
AMD may be behind right now, but for most of this decade, Intel has been following AMD.