Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Nov 2009 21:53 UTC
Legal We've got some progress in the other legal case Apple is involved in. The California case, Apple vs. Psystar, is more or less a done deal, but the Florida case, Psystar vs. Apple, is only just beginning. As it promised it would do, Apple has now asked the court in California to either dismiss the Florida case, or transfer it to California. Apple is also asking for a permanent injuction against Psystar. Through this motion, we also gain some juicy insight into Psystar's sales projections - and more interestingly, how many machines the clone maker actually sold.
Thread beginning with comment 397139
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Comment by bongo_x
by rhavyn on Mon 30th Nov 2009 18:30 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by bongo_x"
rhavyn
Member since:
2005-07-06

You are correct, I only read the part where he said "I wasn't sure, but it seems to me a company could say in court "they didn't stop Company A, why are they trying to stop us?"." Not the part where he was talking about losing rights. My apologies. You can say in court, they didn't stop Company A, why are they trying to stop us. And the court can, in fact, say, well, they can't stop you. But they court will not simply take your rights.

Reply Parent Score: 2