Linked by Kroc Camen on Sun 29th Nov 2009 20:02 UTC, submitted by fsmag
Thread beginning with comment 397143
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: internet PC of the mid 90's
by sbergman27 on Mon 30th Nov 2009 19:07
in reply to "RE[5]: internet PC of the mid 90's"
I like how, after I've presented my counter-claim, your main point is suddenly and retroactively shifted to being how trusting the cloud is bad, and we shouldn't try to use it to replace our desktops.
Obviously, you misunderstood my original post. Read it again in the context of what you now know of my position and then come back and comment. Your "counter-claim" was simply that the cloud sometimes works well enough to be useful. If I did not agree with that much I wouldn't bother with mobile broadband in the first place. Though, quite frankly, I do think a bit less of you for owning an iPhone. But for unrelated reasons.




Member since:
2009-02-19
Now, you see, that's cute, because most of your first post was about how Cloud Computing didn't work because it was not universally available and reliable: that's kindof the point -- so far as I can tell -- of your whole anecdote about how long it took to book your hotel while traveling. I like how, after I've presented my counter-claim, your main point is suddenly and retroactively shifted to being how trusting the cloud is bad, and we shouldn't try to use it to replace our desktops.
Well, on that point, I completely agree with you, obviously, and have never tried to claim otherwise. And I think google would agree with you, too. I get the impression that Chrome OS is mainly intended for small, mobile communicating computers, and is certainly not (primarily) intended to replace (or even necessarily operate on or compete directly with) people's home desktops and workstations.