Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Nov 2009 19:37 UTC, submitted by -ujb-
Thread beginning with comment 397235
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-03-29
Pffft. PS3 is a much easier target than 360 which is totally closed. At least PS3 has a history of supporting an 'other' OS. Of course they dropped that on the slim model, but the older models are still on shelves (barely). Also the 360 does funky stuff to make it seem as though you have multiple CPUs. The PS3, to all intents and purposes, only has one CPU, which is all an Amiga-like OS can support anyway. 2D acceleration, while not ideal, is plenty for a desktop experience, and 512meg is not a showstopper for such small footprint OSes with traditionally small apps. If you leave the Cell stuff alone for all but 3D or movie playback it would be a neat little low cost machine to run an OS on. With standard hardware and a large installed hardware base I would have thought a port to PS3 would be a no-brainer. Indeed OS4 devs openly contemplated how they might go about using the cells, so at least there is some thought in that direction.