Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Dec 2009 22:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 397956
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not fast to remote parts of the world
by siimo on Fri 4th Dec 2009 19:19
in reply to "RE: Not fast to remote parts of the world"
RE[2]: Not fast to remote parts of the world
by StephenBeDoper on Mon 7th Dec 2009 17:24
in reply to "RE: Not fast to remote parts of the world"
AFAIK "all" of the big ISPs in Canada and the US are hijacking failed DNS requests to redirect you to their own services instead of just telling you it's a bad host name.
Rogers Cable certainly does, I haven't seen that from Aliant/Bell yet (just a matter of time, though, since the two appear to be on a relay-race-to-the-bottom). They have some sort of partnership with Yahoo, so failed lookups redirect you to a Rogers-branded Yahoo search page.
For my money, the most annoying thing is that it breaks Firefox's ability to keep invalid URLs out of the auto-complete history. Fortunately, it's fairly simple to "fix" by adding the URL of the search page to your hosts file, pointed at 127.0.0.1 (the old-school ad blocking trick).




Member since:
2005-07-14
I don't know how NZ ISPs behave, but the ones most people use in North America are slimy, paint-huffing crack addicts.
AFAIK "all" of the big ISPs in Canada and the US are hijacking failed DNS requests to redirect you to their own services instead of just telling you it's a bad host name.
My ISP (Teksavvy) doesn't, but they're a rather small player compared to Rogers and Bell.