Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Dec 2009 00:00 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 398618
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Totally subjective. How can it compete with KMail, for example?
Subjectively speaking, kmail was much slower and more crash-prone for me than thunderbird 2. Obviously I have no benchmarks to prove it.
As for thunderbird 3, it's no comparison at all (though I haven't tried the latest kmail builds...).
Member since:
2005-07-22
Totally subjective. How can it compete with KMail, for example?