Linked by David Adams on Fri 11th Dec 2009 01:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 399101
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Statement defensible
by jack_perry on Fri 11th Dec 2009 19:31
in reply to "RE[4]: Statement defensible"
It's a terrible example. Do you really think that most people visiting porn sites know what and how much information they're sharing with those sites, or of how easy it is for someone to snoop on them while doing it? I doubt it.
You also think porn sites are trustworthy? Do you think most people who visit them, believe the sites to be trustworthy? If so, they're gravely mistaken. Porn sites have been known to embarrass users by obtaining private information without permission and (for example) emailing them image-laden links. ("That must be spam, dear; I have no idea why that company imagines I would be interested in their products.")




Member since:
2006-09-18
Porn sites are prefect examples. You share your private information with sites or people you trust.
I trust that porn sites will not share that information with my mother. Security through obscurity is real and practical for many purposes. There is theoretical security, then there is real life.