Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Dec 2009 20:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 399733
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
GPL is not suitable for business- every self declared Software "Freedom" Law Center can harass you, your client and your derivative work on behalf of developers who are paid for their consulting work by so called "violators".
While I don't totally agree, one thing in the slashdot comments that caught my attention was the assertion that someone who buys a product containing GPL code and then re-sells it is responsible for passing on the license text and source code to the next buyer.
This provides an interesting problem for retailers and used-product sales...
While I don't totally agree, one thing in the slashdot comments that caught my attention was the assertion that someone who buys a product containing GPL code and then re-sells it is responsible for passing on the license text and source code to the next buyer.
This provides an interesting problem for retailers and used-product sales...
No, the GPL only says that you have to make the source code available.
You can do that by putting it on your web site, or even by including it on the CD.
Not a problem for retailers.
This provides an interesting problem for retailers and used-product sales...
Not really that interesting… Let’s take an example: most games produced now that use external libraries choose to put copyright texts in the intro sequence, probably the most annoying place for it. But what if they put it on a piece of paper inside the case, like they do now with GPL notices? That paper could be lost, and then once the game is resold, it no longer bares the licence texts. Exact same issue.
Manufacturers would solve it if they included the notice in the product (System About menu?) and if they included a CD in the first place. If you read the GPL, it’ll give suggestions for methods of supply. Most choose the latter, allowing customers to contact them for it. and that causes most of these issues :^)





Member since:
2006-05-19
GPL is not suitable for business- every self declared Software "Freedom" Law Center can harass you, your client and your derivative work on behalf of developers who are paid for their consulting work by so called "violators".
Choose real freedom and abandon GPL wreck NOW!