Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Dec 2009 00:13 UTC
Gnome In the item we ran yesterday about GNOME and the GNU Project, one aspect got snowed under a little bit. It turns out a claim made in the iTWire article about the role a blog post by Miguel De Icaza was false, and even though the claim wasn't ours, I did repeat it, and therefore, should correct it too. I also need to offer apologies for not framing the opening of the article clear enough - had I framed it better, a lot of pointless discussion and name-calling could've been avoided.
Thread beginning with comment 399827
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
ansidotsys
Member since:
2008-08-15

Now in case anyone interprets my previous post as too harsh, I would like to mention that Thom does write some interesting articles. Most recently is the article below:

http://www.osnews.com/story/21999/Editorial_X_Could_Learn_a_Lot_fro...

A lot of the content in that article, however controversial, was his own and offered an interesting point of view not often expressed on front page articles. It was a good article in my opinion, and brought a lot of interesting discussion as can be seen by the discussions of that article.

But nevertheless, nobody is going to deny the arrogant attitude that is inherent to much of his articles. It's just annoying to add to that fact that much of his 'articles' aren't even composed of his own ideas. Perhaps if more of his articles were similar to the one linked above, things would be different...

Reply Parent Score: 1

Tuishimi Member since:
2005-07-06

Who has the time?

Reply Parent Score: 2