Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Dec 2009 00:13 UTC
Gnome In the item we ran yesterday about GNOME and the GNU Project, one aspect got snowed under a little bit. It turns out a claim made in the iTWire article about the role a blog post by Miguel De Icaza was false, and even though the claim wasn't ours, I did repeat it, and therefore, should correct it too. I also need to offer apologies for not framing the opening of the article clear enough - had I framed it better, a lot of pointless discussion and name-calling could've been avoided.
Thread beginning with comment 399881
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Nice apology/clarification
by kaiwai on Wed 16th Dec 2009 12:11 UTC in reply to "Nice apology/clarification"
Member since:

I think you clarified things well. I don't take that for granted. Most wouldn't take the time.

Now let's move on to which is freer - the BSD license or the GPL. Shouldn't take long.

I propose the BJ licence; if you want to use the code you have to give the main programmer a BJ.

It is a win-win situation; you get the code and the programmer finally gets laid. Both get screwed - but in a good way ;)

Edited 2009-12-16 12:13 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

boldingd Member since:

I... can't believe you actually said that.

Reply Parent Score: 2