Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Dec 2009 21:38 UTC, submitted by whorider
Privacy, Security, Encryption This news is already a week old, but it only got submitted to us today, and I didn't notice it all. As it turns out, two malicious software packages had been uploaded to GNOME-Look.org, masquerading as valid .deb packages (a GNOME screensaver and theme, respectively).
Thread beginning with comment 400216
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Is it really necessary?
by strcpy on Fri 18th Dec 2009 04:03 UTC in reply to "RE: Is it really necessary?"
strcpy
Member since:
2009-05-20


Why do people persist in thinking that /etc/logrotate.conf is more important than the user's home directory?


It is not more important as data. But this line of thinking worries me. It has "Fedora 12" painted to it; Linux is now suddenly understood to be a big single user "Desktop Spin" (whatever that means).

But as the poster above tried to say, if you are able to own, perhaps in addition to user's data, that /etc/logrotate.conf, implying root compromise, you can probably greatly lengthen the period of the compromise as well as hide the detection of it. To name few examples.

Edited 2009-12-18 04:06 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2