Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 18th Dec 2009 16:58 UTC
The Mono project has released Moonlight 2, the open source implementation of Microsoft's Silverlight. Moonlight allows Silverlight content to run on platforms that do not have an official Silverlight client, such as Linux and PowerPC Macs. Microsoft also expanded its patent agreement with Novell to cover all users of Moonlight, no matter the Linux version.
Thread beginning with comment 400317
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-11-10
Which will be 24fps in a years time, double again in another year, and so on so forth.
Talk about miss the point. You’re not impressed by the fact that you didn’t have to choose the right binary for your system, download it, install it—then locate the ROM, download it, open the emulator, open the ROM and _then_ start playing.
Member since:2005-09-27
Member since:2005-07-22
Which will be 24fps in a years time, double again in another year, and so on so forth.
Talk about miss the point. You’re not impressed by the fact that you didn’t have to choose the right binary for your system, download it, install it—then locate the ROM, download it, open the emulator, open the ROM and _then_ start playing.
Talk about miss the point. You’re not impressed by the fact that you didn’t have to choose the right binary for your system, download it, install it—then locate the ROM, download it, open the emulator, open the ROM and _then_ start playing.
If you are looking for an old console emulator, then you most certainly know how to get it without having to suffer the pain of 12fps. Why people find more important installation, that only happens once, than normal and day to day usage?
Member since:2009-05-20
Wow. The future of computers... a game running at 12fps on my machine that is nearly 2 decades newer than the Amiga the game originally debuted on.
Why is the majority of the world convinced that everything should be in a browser? I'll never know...
Why is the majority of the world convinced that everything should be in a browser? I'll never know...
Yeah. You stole my thoughts. Someone should write a big philosophical editorial about the big and devastating regression that the "web 2.0" has brought.
I mean that's what this is all about: we are debating about how we can play videos? Hello? What year is this?
Edited 2009-12-19 06:55 UTC
Member since:2005-11-10
Member since:2005-07-06
"Wow. The future of computers... a game running at 12fps on my machine that is nearly 2 decades newer than the Amiga the game originally debuted on.
Why is the majority of the world convinced that everything should be in a browser? I'll never know...
Why is the majority of the world convinced that everything should be in a browser? I'll never know...
Yeah. You stole my thoughts. Someone should write a big philosophical editorial about the big and devastating regression that the "web 2.0" has brought. "
You say that like it's a bad thing
Look how far we've come: 15 years ago, if you wanted to take part in an online discussion, there was Usenet - where you had a measly 2 or 3 levels of abstraction (a NNTP client, running on your OS, running on top of your hardware). But today, to do the same thing, you get 5 or 6 levels of abstraction (web-based forum software using an API implement in JaS, executed by the JS interpreter of your browser, running on your OS, on top of your hardware). That's progress, right?
Member since:
2005-07-25
Wow. The future of computers... a game running at 12fps on my machine that is nearly 2 decades newer than the Amiga the game originally debuted on.
Why is the majority of the world convinced that everything should be in a browser? I'll never know...