Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 19th Dec 2009 11:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 400459
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So base on the rationing I get a choice between a group of mediocre hardware builders or submit to a single choice of a provider, aka monopoly. I might go for the former.
To make your decision even easier, what if the "mediocre" hardware was the exact same as that used by the "monopoly" company? And the "monopoly" company charged twice as much?




Member since:
2009-04-05
What's so pretty about Microsoft images that is left to be tainted?
You want me to only be be able to buy Microsoft propriety hardwares to use with Microsoft propriety softwares just like Mac. And that Microsoft would make better hardware products than these third party manufacturers like ASUS and Gigabytes that taints their images. O fcourse I was meaning supplied parts hardwares not whole PC building. I am very happy that I get that kind of choice for quality hardwares.
If you really mean the whole PC built for sales tainting images, I guess that means Dell, HP, Acer, etc.
Edited 2009-12-19 21:08 UTC