To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Using Thom's definitions, it is a little hard to place early versions of Linux. On one hand, it was a pure hobby OS, comparable to ReactOS. On the other hand, its relationship to Unix was more like that of Haiku to BeOS.
In the early 1990s, the OS landscape was much more fragmented. Home users primarily ran a mix of MS-DOS, early Microsoft Windows and a variety of 8-bit micro operating systems with the classic MacOS being more the domain of visual arts professionals. Home Unix was something of the geek Holy Grail and usually took the form of proprietary variants on surplus hardware (3b1, anyone?), expensive x86 ports (Xenix) or affordable clones (Minix, Coherent).
Linus created Linux while searching for that holy grail and its early success is a testament to the depth of the need it filled. What we think of now as the BSDs also came out of this same search and its fulfillment. Arguably, had Bill Jolitz handled the early days of 386BSD better, there might not have even been a Linux.
The lesson in this may be that part of what takes a Hobby OS to the next level is that it fulfills a desire of a larger community which is not met effectively or economically by the larger industry.
The ultra-silent PC crowd, who can't abide the regular fans and power supplies that the rest of us use, ought to have a look at this:
http://tinyurl.com/ydblzms
(The PC7300 model later became the 3B1.)
I supported many a 3B2 back in the day... but I've only ever seen one of these things.
Edited 2009-12-21 15:47 UTC




Member since:
2005-11-02
Once upon a time there was a hobby OS called Linux. You had to download source code from ftp sites and cross compile it to even build the boot floppy!
The big players were a handful of UNIX vendors, Microsoft and Apple. Everything else was a rounding error.