Linked by snydeq on Wed 6th Jan 2010 20:08 UTC
Google InfoWorld's Galen Gruman writes that the main potential game-changing attribute of the Nexus One - that Google is selling the device direct - does nothing to move the industry past carrier lock-in. "At first, I wanted to credit Google for making a tentative step in the direction of smartphone freedom. But that step is so tentative and ineffectual that frankly I think it's a cynical fig leaf covering the usual practices," Gruman writes. At issue is a political battle regarding walled gardens in the U.S. cellular market, a fight that will take years to result in any true consumer freedom. "The only way we'll ever get the ability to choose a smartphone and carrier independently is for the platform providers that count - Apple, Google, and RIM - to first develop only multiband 'world' smartphones and then refuse to sell their devices (or in Google's case, use its Android license to forbid the sale of devices) to carriers that block or interfere with device portability."
Thread beginning with comment 402981
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Baby steps and bad press
by Laurence on Thu 7th Jan 2010 10:38 UTC in reply to "RE: Baby steps and bad press"
Laurence
Member since:
2007-03-26

Agreed, but at the end of the day a good product from a great brand will win.

Over here in Germany everyone says "Google is evil, big brother" bla , BUT Google has like 90+ % marketshare in search.

I hear so many people saying "Gmail reads your email!!" Well, Googles server read your email and analyse them and A LOT of servers read your email. If you don't want your email to be read by others don't send any or use strong encrption.

Those same people usally use their credit card with iTunes and send all their pirated MP3 to Apple without the slightest worry.

I think Google is a great company, way better than all the old IT big boys.


I agree to a degree.

People are right to be wary. Particularly when it's their identity at risk.
However one reason I've always defended Google over many of the other old IT big boys is because Google are proactive in reinvesting their technologies into the industry rather than hoarding.
They're also not so hell bent on locking people into their technologies (as advertising is their revenue, they don't care what platforms and software you run - just so long as you're using their ads)

For me at the moment ,Google is the lesser of the evils between (for example) Apple and MS. As things change, my allegiances might change too.

I hear so many people saying "Gmail reads your email!!" Well, Googles server read your email and analyse them and A LOT of servers read your email. If you don't want your email to be read by others don't send any or use strong encrption.


Or run your own mail server.... :p

Reply Parent Score: 3