Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 11th Jan 2010 08:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 403705
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-01-11
Don't quote me out of context. I was specifically referring to VFX studios. For them it is by and large irrelevant if an application is Open Source or not. They use what gets the job done most efficiently. In-house, open source, proprietary -- it really doesn't matter to them. What matters are costs and benefits.
And for the sake of god: Open Source is only then a feature, if you can leverage it, and always under the assumption that the code quality is at least above average! In your imagination every user is a hacker. Ever wondered why Linux can't grab more of the Desktop market? No? Thought so.