Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jan 2010 00:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 403903
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: Interesting.......
by Aragorn992 on Thu 14th Jan 2010 09:04
in reply to "RE[8]: Interesting......."
Yes. It is still clear. Your attempted obfuscation by changing what was clearly the implicit basis of his question (if not, through omission, explicit)does nothing to make it leass clear to those reading without an adenda.
Adding context is not attempting obfuscation. It is (among other things) testing the statement that was first made based on Kants' categorical imperative, which I would suggest you read.
Disclaimer: I don't necessarily agree with any of Kant's arguments (but they are compelling).
Edited 2010-01-14 09:05 UTC




Member since:
2009-08-17
Yes. It is still clear. Your attempted obfuscation by changing what was clearly the implicit basis of his question (if not, through omission, explicit)does nothing to make it leass clear to those reading without an adenda.