Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Jan 2010 23:08 UTC
Legal A few days ago, technology blog Valleywag's launched its Apple Tablet Scavenger Hunt, a sort-of contest in which people with evidence of the existence of Apple's much-rumoured tablet could win large sums of money. Apple apparently wasn't amused, as the company resorted to its usual tactic whenever it doesn't like something in the press: litigation, litigation, litigation.
Thread beginning with comment 404213
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
jabbotts
Member since:
2007-09-06

I heard a crack pusher recently moved into an apartment you moved out of several years ago; naturally, that must mean your evil and mixed up in illegal drugs right?

I think if you take a moment to look at Apple's current staffing, you'll find that Mr Wozniak has not worked there in quite some time. Your slamming him because of what the company has done since he left? Seriously?

By all means, take issue with how Apple does business but take a few minute to see what Mr Wozniak has been doing since. One has to respect The Woz for still being a hacker (in the truest meaning) and what he's done since then. (I don't see Mr Jobs teaching computing to kids.)

Reply Parent Score: 4

Gone fishing Member since:
2006-02-22

[rant] I don't have a problem with Wozniak - I'm pleased that early Apple recognized the GUI and its potential when Xerox didn't. However, early Apple triumphed by being an on the edge, sail close to the wind company. It now wishes to close the door on others and pretends what it did then was ethical but if someone does the same now it is unethical.

it is transformed itself into the model of respectability but under the surface is an unethical, hypocritical, spiteful company. Give me Google or even Microsoft any-day [/rant]

Reply Parent Score: 2

jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06

Non of your issues have anything to do with Mr Wazniak and how Apple was though. This is all how Apple is now and with it being a very separate entity from it's original hardware designer.

"Steve Wozniak on the tube glorying in the hacker / cracker origins of Apple"

This came across as criticizing Wozniak for what Apple has developed into simply because he remembers the history and original atmosphere. I see Mr Wazniak (who frequently talked to strange geeks appearing at his webcam and chat forum) as very separate from the current incarnation of the company he happened to help start. It's not like when he left, he could hand down commandments to continue guiding the company in his absense.

I'm not not getting a connection between him in interviews remembering how the company was and how that relates to how the company is now.

Apple truly was the company that started the consumer affordable desktop. They where the company that demonstrated what a GUI interface could do outside of PARC labs. In the same way, I have to respect Adobe for being the company that first took printing beyond typewriter output and into the graphic output we have now. I don't see remembering and respecting that history as a personal endorsement that they are still making that level of evolutionary contribution to computing. Similarly, Micro-soft was the company that free'd most people from IBM's monopoly and that should be recognized but don't think that stops me from also recognizing that it simply turned around and reinvented IBM's monopoly in it's own image.

Edited 2010-01-15 18:59 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2