Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 17th Jan 2010 23:38 UTC, submitted by OSGuy
Thread beginning with comment 404590
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Correct me please,if I'm wrong
by Budd on Mon 18th Jan 2010 10:44
in reply to "RE: Correct me please,if I'm wrong"
OK,but Apple are not members of the GSM assoc. so the RAND terms would not apply to them,correct?
http://www.gsmworld.com/membership/associate_members.htm
Edited 2010-01-18 10:45 UTC
RE[3]: Correct me please,if I'm wrong
by eriwik on Mon 18th Jan 2010 19:31
in reply to "RE[2]: Correct me please,if I'm wrong"
OK,but Apple are not members of the GSM assoc. so the RAND terms would not apply to them,correct?
http://www.gsmworld.com/membership/associate_members.htm
http://www.gsmworld.com/membership/associate_members.htm
Nope, it usually don't work that way, the RAND terms usually applies to all licensees. That's the ETSI IPR Policy (and I assume that Nokia belongs to ETSI) which out to be about the same as any of the other associations'.
RE[2]: Correct me please,if I'm wrong
by fithisux on Mon 18th Jan 2010 12:45
in reply to "RE: Correct me please,if I'm wrong"
Unfortunately, you are wrong Budd . Some royalties and license fees are passed to the customers who buy the chip/hardware to make the phone.
This is fair. I also have to add that everything should be standrdized (no proprietary drivers) and pass the cost to consumers. A fair and open society.




Member since:
2010-01-18
Unfortunately, you are wrong Budd . Some royalties and license fees are passed to the customers who buy the chip/hardware to make the phone.
Edited 2010-01-18 10:34 UTC