Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Jan 2010 16:06 UTC, submitted by fireball
Thread beginning with comment 404643
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Except that Linux wasn't trying to be a better Windows... Better OS maybe, but not a clone+1.
It was trying to be better than UNIX (obviously), which commercial flavors were prevailing back then. Noone really could believe that some enthuasist-made OS kernel could become mainstream in future. And I'm sure people were saying "who needs Linux? We have major commercial UNIX implementations, supported by hundreds of skilled people and companies with good reputation.".





Member since:
2006-07-15
They used to say the same about Linux in ~1993.
But thanks for words of support!
Edited 2010-01-18 17:37 UTC