Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Jan 2010 16:06 UTC, submitted by fireball
Thread beginning with comment 404902
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-06
You think?
Closed drivers are bad enough. Mainly because no one else can fix or improve them.
But closed drivers from another platform? That forces a stable api in the kernel, which is as bad or worse.
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.32/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense...
No, both projects are crazy. Wine on top of a free Linux is the best long term hope for being able to run Windows apps on something other than Windows. But you can bet MS will fight it every step of the way (extend, extinguish).
http://www.theregister.co.uk/1999/07/18/analysis_how_ms_used/
History of this almost happening before with Win32.
http://tuxdeluxe.org/node/296
MS and standards
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.32/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense...
Why stable driver API are bad