Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th Jan 2010 17:59 UTC
Mozilla & Gecko clones This week, both YouTube and Vimeo opened up beta offerings using HTML5 video instead of Flash to bring video content to users. Both of them chose to use the h264 codec, which meant that only Safari and Chrome can play these videos, since firefox doesn't license the h264 codec. Mike Shaver, Mozilla's vice president of engineering, explained on his blog why Mozilla doesn't license the h264 codec.
Thread beginning with comment 405994
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
modmans2ndcoming
Member since:
2005-11-09

you really think FF will build their own codec version of h.264? They will use an implementation from someone else, and then hook their code into it. the hooks and their browser can be open. the codec does not have to be.

Reply Parent Score: 2

lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

you really think FF will build their own codec version of h.264? They will use an implementation from someone else, and then hook their code into it. the hooks and their browser can be open. the codec does not have to be.


Most decidedly the codec MUST NOT BE proprietary or patent encumbered in any way.

It is one of the fundamental things about the web that must be protected at all costs.

No proprietary, exclusionist, rip-off control-freak technologies for the public-access web!!

Reply Parent Score: 2