Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th Jan 2010 17:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 405994
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Active X and Video Codec
by lemur2 on Tue 26th Jan 2010 03:43
in reply to "RE[4]: Active X and Video Codec"
you really think FF will build their own codec version of h.264? They will use an implementation from someone else, and then hook their code into it. the hooks and their browser can be open. the codec does not have to be.
Most decidedly the codec MUST NOT BE proprietary or patent encumbered in any way.
It is one of the fundamental things about the web that must be protected at all costs.
No proprietary, exclusionist, rip-off control-freak technologies for the public-access web!!




Member since:
2005-11-09
you really think FF will build their own codec version of h.264? They will use an implementation from someone else, and then hook their code into it. the hooks and their browser can be open. the codec does not have to be.