To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Then why do you care if Chrome goes up by 1's instead of 0.1's?
If by "marketing" you mean "simpler," then I guess so. Since it's all arbitrary, you might as well cut the modesty and estimation and decimals, and just increment by one every time. Let people who care read the release notes if they want to find out "how much" has changed.
But they didn't.
... This time. Previously they jumped from 2.0 straight to 3.0, and the plan after 3.7 is to skip to 4.
I'm meaning arbitrary because there is no "law" on what to do.
That is how Microsoft went from Word 2.0 for Windows to Word 6.0. Or how WordPerfect for Windows started at 5.1.
Now, "normally", products start at 1.0, and grow in version number as in MAJOR.Minor updates.
So, no, going from 1.0 to 4.0 in 1.5 years is NOT normal, and it is a marketing plot for sure: Chrome 4.0 should be better than Firefox 3.5, but still worst than IE 8.0, so probably in another year, Chrome would be at 8.0.
And I don't care. It's just an observation.
By the way. Mozilla jumped from 2.0 to 3.0 after 1.5 years. And the changes from 2.0 to 3.0 where major enough to warrant that option.
Same time it took google to go from 1.0 to 4.0.
Edited 2010-01-26 14:30 UTC
Firefox 1.0: first real release with nice extension manager
Firefox 1.5: great update manager and a big improvement to extension mananger
Firefox 2.0: spellcheck, session restore, phishing protection
Firefox 3.0: faster javascript, resume download, tab scrolling, awesomebar, Full page zoom, better password management, bookmark tags, much lower memory usage
Firefox 3.5: faster javascript, HTML5 <video><audio><Drag and drop><offline>, improved awesomebar
Firefox 3.6: faster javascipt, improved HTML5 like video, personas
Chrome 1.0: fast startup, fast javascript, fast rendering
Chrome 2.0: ehm?
Chrome 3.0: ehm? extensions?
Chrome 4.0: ehm? something like personas?




Member since:
2005-07-06
Version number is always arbitrary.
But the point is that from 1.0 to 4.0 in 1.5 years is tooooo marketing.
If mozilla wanted marketing, they could have called 3.6 4.0.
But they didn't.