Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Jan 2010 15:14 UTC, submitted by historyb
Thread beginning with comment 406178
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not on chrome you imply?
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 27th Jan 2010 15:53
in reply to "RE[2]: Not on chrome you imply?"
I think you're forgetting the word "yet" somewhere there. Once Chrome stabilizes a bit more, why wouldn't it be pulled into the standard Ubuntu repo? And once that happens why wouldn't they set Yahoo as default?
Because Chrome can't be included in Ubuntu's repositories, not even the partner ones, due to the h264 license. Only Google may distribute it.
RE[4]: Not on chrome you imply?
by GatoLoko on Wed 27th Jan 2010 17:38
in reply to "RE[3]: Not on chrome you imply?"
But they can include Chromium, the open source part of Chrome, and choose whether they want to compile it with h264 support or not. There is even a PPA repository with daily snapshots where the codecs are optional (free or nonfree).
https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa
Edit: fixed a typo
Edited 2010-01-27 17:39 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-06
I think you're forgetting the word "yet" somewhere there. Once Chrome stabilizes a bit more, why wouldn't it be pulled into the standard Ubuntu repo? And once that happens why wouldn't they set Yahoo as default?