To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
no , the key thing here is that although they change the default for "comercial reasons" , they do not hinder in any way your freedom to use whatever you want.
ubuntu is not obligated to sponsor google nor redhat
kde is not obligated to sponsor gnome
vim is not obligated to sponsor to emacs
if they made the google search slower or worse in any way compared to "default google search" , than that would be a problem for freedom.
freedom has nothing to do with "not making money" or "not market for your own things for money".
it has to do with hindering your "personal choice". and ubuntu has done nothing of that.
although i am defending ubuntu i, actually , am a gentoo and kde guy , so , ubuntu to me is the "worse" distro that can be 
Ubuntu changes its default search provider to make some money - yeah, where's the problem?
Canonical is a company that develops Ubuntu - it has a workforce they need paying etc this requires money.
I fail to see the problem we're geeks it will take 10 seconds to change the provider back to Google or a few more to install Chrome.
Further more if I can help Canonical by using Yahoo to click a few adds when I want to buy something I may well do.
It's hardly good supporting a company such as Yahoo, who have very little or no FOSS contribution.
I think Canonical should think about FOSS and pick more wisely, rather than think about the money no matter who it is.
I see Canonical getting pain for this, just like Novell siding with Microsoft.





Member since:
2006-04-22
I think the key thing to notice here is that Ubuntu is taking money to make a decision about the UI.
This is significant because previously all such decisions were about what was best for the user. Answer this, why didn't they change to Yahoo before?? Because everyone knows full well that google is a better search engine and what 99.9% of Ubuntu users prefer.
This isn't about being a freedom Nazi (which I actually am). It is about realizing that Ubuntu previously had a business model that entirely depended on user satisfaction and consequently there was no conflict of interest. Not anymore.