Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Jan 2010 19:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 406294
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
$199 would be reasonable. ATM this thing is three times more expensive than superior netbooks. And less useful. Or put differently. I can buy a dual core x64 laptop with 500 GB harddisk, 16" monitor and so on for the same price. Or quad core if it is stationary.
And remember, the prices in Europe will be approx. twice those of USA (it'll cost the same as the sam440).
ATM this thing is three times more expensive than superior netbooks
What new netbook costs $170? Can those netbook give me 10 hours of battery life and does it weigh less than 2 lbs? If the answer to those two questions are no, then I wouldn't consider those netbook superior.
I can buy a dual core x64 laptop with 500 GB harddisk, 16" monitor
Again, missing the point. I'm willing to pay extra not have to carry around a 16" monitor and to not have a battery eating CPU. In this case a 10-11" monitor is superior to a 16-17" monitor and the most important spec for a CPU is measured in Watts not Hertz. There is more to computers than simply counting FLOPS.





Member since:
2007-04-23
499 is the initial early adopter price, how quickly will that price drop? (remember the original iphones?)...