Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Oct 2005 14:54 UTC, submitted by Swank1
Thread beginning with comment 40651
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
Yes, BeOS is significantly different: its aim was to give a TUE (Total User Experience) in much the same thought process of Apple and their products. Linux? No, consistency is very much not their reason for existing, and thus you have an incredible number of choices that are mutually incompatible with each other, all on the same OS base that isn't integrated.
Well, the BeOS kernel isn't integrated with the GUI, either, but there's a great advantage to having a single target to develop for, and to support.