Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 406577
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Turing's Poisoned Apple
by _txf_ on Fri 29th Jan 2010 02:04
in reply to "RE[2]: Turing's Poisoned Apple"
RE[4]: Turing's Poisoned Apple
by Laurence on Fri 29th Jan 2010 02:19
in reply to "RE[3]: Turing's Poisoned Apple"
I'm not quite sure you got the fact that he was making a droll comment.
(pointless->no pointing) hence the problem...aww is just not funny when it has to be explained
(pointless->no pointing) hence the problem...aww is just not funny when it has to be explained
Yeah, I got the joke, but not until after posting my reply *doh!*
As you can't delete posts, it was just easier to leave the comment there in case anyone wants to expand on my sentiments (be it fore or against)




Member since:
2007-03-26
And for a multi touch device that's got to be a problem... "
Despite what Apple state, multi-touch doesn't make the device more usable.
It might make some specific jobs more intuitive, but if you can't use the device for your primary role (be it taking notes in lectures, reading eBooks on the train or drawing art work) then being able to use 2 fingures instead of one - or even two hands - doesn't magically fix the other short comings.
You're still going to need a stylus, hardware keyboard, etc.
Besides, it's not as if other multi-touch devices don't exist.
Edited 2010-01-29 00:54 UTC