Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Apple Yes, yes, I apologise. After Kroc's story earlier today, and together with this one, we now have three stories in a row on the Ipad iPad (sorry, I can't ban camel case from OSNews just yet). So, what are we going to do? Predictions? Criticism? More details? No - I want to explain what I think the differences are between the introduction of the iPod and the iPhone, and that of the iPad.
Thread beginning with comment 406593
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Turing's Poisoned Apple
by _txf_ on Fri 29th Jan 2010 02:22 UTC in reply to "RE: Turing's Poisoned Apple"
_txf_
Member since:
2008-03-17

-That keyboard definitely sucks. It is absolute insanity to expect essays or even a medium sized email to be typed up on this thing. It isn't about the size but about the more direct feedback you get from pressing keys and not to mention the shock absorption that comes from pressing buttons.

-There are no apps and no methods to deal with direct input from a pen (specifically designed for it or no).
So some enterprising developer comes along and says yup I have a pen based handwriting solution but i need to sell the pen and install drivers....wait not gonna happen because apple will probably deny it in the app store, let alone trying to install it by other means.

Managing documents is a no go as this device needs to b-e synced (no file manager here).

-It is too expensive to be used in education, which requires much more flexibility in a device...for starters the ability to install educational software.

-What the device does do well is play and view APPLE'S MEDIA because I can't see apple allowing any old format to work with this thing.
For audio it isn't that big a deal due to the ubiquity of mp3, ease and speed of transcoding etc. But for video it is plain silly as video takes too long to transcode and the market is too fractured under competing implementations e.g. hulu,itunes netflix and not to mention divx etc.

Reply Parent Score: 2

sultanqasim Member since:
2006-10-28

I agree that a tactile keyboard is ergonomically better than a touchscreen, but use a larger touchscreen for a day and you'll find its not half as bad as you felt it was at first. I could barely type a word when I first tried an iPhone but within 15 minutes, I was able to do 15 wpm with my thumb on that tiny keyboard. I'm certain a larger one would be much easier.

Format support for media is quite wide, and transcoding doesn't take that long on a modern computer. It's absurd to suggest that it doesn't support non-apple media.

It does support any software in the app store, including educational apps.

No drivers are needed for the multi touch styluses, and there are already handwriting recognition apps in the app store (e.g. WritePad).

One area I where strongly agree with you is the need for a File Manager. If you plan on making many documents, it'll be much better to have a centralized file manager rather than having a unique list of documents for each app. Support for wireless file transfer will be good to. For now, Olive Toast's Files will have to do, but a proper integrated file manager would be much preferred [provided that it's not crippled in some way].

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Turing's Poisoned Apple
by _txf_ on Fri 29th Jan 2010 10:18 in reply to "RE[3]: Turing's Poisoned Apple"
_txf_ Member since:
2008-03-17

It must be just me, but I hate touchscreen keyboards no matter the size. Sure, after a while I do speed up, but it is nowhere near as pleasant and I make far more errors on touchscreen keyboards than regular physical keyboards.

Does it support wmv,divx or h.264 containers other than QT? Doubtful. Could I install an app that does support these formats? Doubtful.

When I say educational software I mean stuff institutions buy in bulk, usually with only windows versions. Require installations other than through the app store.

Reply Parent Score: 2