Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Apple Yes, yes, I apologise. After Kroc's story earlier today, and together with this one, we now have three stories in a row on the Ipad iPad (sorry, I can't ban camel case from OSNews just yet). So, what are we going to do? Predictions? Criticism? More details? No - I want to explain what I think the differences are between the introduction of the iPod and the iPhone, and that of the iPad.
Thread beginning with comment 406603
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Turing's Poisoned Apple
by sultanqasim on Fri 29th Jan 2010 05:07 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Turing's Poisoned Apple"
sultanqasim
Member since:
2006-10-28

Then the iPad's not for you. Just because it doesn't do what you want doesn't mean its a bad device. Name a single hand holdable tablet with a Pixel Qi touchscreen and tactile keyboard with decent battery life, viewing angle, speed, that runs windows, and costs under $1000. If one exists, please tell me about it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

Then the iPad's not for you. Just because it doesn't do what you want doesn't mean its a bad device.


I'm saying I can't see how it's useable for almost anyone.

Sure, there will be a few people that will like, even love, this device.
But is there enough people to make this product profitable?

So I'm stating that despite all the hype, ultimatly it doesn't solve a problem enough people have to make this device worth while.

Reply Parent Score: 2