Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Apple Yes, yes, I apologise. After Kroc's story earlier today, and together with this one, we now have three stories in a row on the Ipad iPad (sorry, I can't ban camel case from OSNews just yet). So, what are we going to do? Predictions? Criticism? More details? No - I want to explain what I think the differences are between the introduction of the iPod and the iPhone, and that of the iPad.
Thread beginning with comment 406645
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
@haters
by google_ninja on Fri 29th Jan 2010 14:07 UTC
google_ninja
Member since:
2006-02-05

slates are the future. 99.9% of people barely use their general purpose computer for all the things it can do. This is a product specifically aimed at internet / media consumption, social networking, and casual games. Guess what most of the home PC users do?

I completely disagree that the market doesn't exist, it just isn't tapped yet. OSNews readers are not the intended audience, anyone who would be interested in this would be the fringe of what they are targeting.

Reply Score: 4

RE: @haters
by SReilly on Fri 29th Jan 2010 14:47 in reply to "@haters"
SReilly Member since:
2006-12-28

You have a very good point there. For us techies, such a device seems almost anathema considering how fast hardware and operating systems have advanced but for the average home user, a device like this is perfect.

My girlfriend has a user account on my custom built PC and I can tell you, the PC is a screamer. The only thing she uses her account for is web browsing (including email and watching TV shows), the odd text document or spread sheet and the odd bit of either skype or IM. While watching her computer usage habits, she would never use more than about 10% of systems resources and the biggest slice of that %10 is taken up by flash.

A device like the iPad (how I hate that name!) would be exceptionally practical for her. Almost all of her data is stored on the net (I refuse to say cloud ;-) so local storage needs are kept to a minimum. She uses one application at a time and doesn't require four gigs of ram or an SLi rig as the only games she ever plays are card games like solitaire.

I do think there is a market for low powered tablets and if anybody can market the concept, surely it's Apple.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: @haters
by google_ninja on Fri 29th Jan 2010 15:30 in reply to "RE: @haters"
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

Its not only power though, its what the machine is capable of, and all the things that are available on the internet.

At home, I use my computer to
- read industry news
- play games
- program
- record and edit music
- watch tv/movies
- manage my various devices (iphone/ipod/e-reader)
- play around with virtualized operating systems
- experiment with apps and platforms I am not familiar with


My wife uses her computer to
- facebook
- youtube
- look at cute animal pictures
- IM
- watch tv/movies

Thats it. Thats what the iPad does (yeah, the name sucks), it does it well, it does it easily, and it does it with style. Not only that, but throw in 3g, and you don't even have to worry about ISPs or routers or anything like that. And finally, it is at a price comparable to a laptop.

I don't see how this cannot be huge. about 90% of tech bloggers seem to completely miss the point, but that shows more how out of touch they are then anything else (remember this? http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=500) What people here need to realize is that they are a niche audience, things that are popular with them will probably never be mainstream in any significant way.

Edited 2010-01-29 15:31 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: @haters
by macUser on Fri 29th Jan 2010 15:55 in reply to "@haters"
macUser Member since:
2006-12-15

slates are the future. 99.9% of people barely use their general purpose computer for all the things it can do. This is a product specifically aimed at internet / media consumption, social networking, and casual games. Guess what most of the home PC users do?

I completely disagree that the market doesn't exist, it just isn't tapped yet. OSNews readers are not the intended audience, anyone who would be interested in this would be the fringe of what they are targeting.


This device is either going to make complete sense to you or you're going to scratch your head and wonder why it could possibly be so endearing to people.

People got a paradigm changer in the iPad and are so stuck on it not being a super multi-task render farm in their hand they don't even realize it.

Your computer is for work. The iPad is for life.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: @haters
by Laurence on Fri 29th Jan 2010 16:07 in reply to "@haters"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

slates are the future. 99.9% of people barely use their general purpose computer for all the things it can do.

So the future is less capable devices at inflated prices?!?


This is a product specifically aimed at internet / media consumption, social networking, and casual games. Guess what most of the home PC users do?

At a guess: they Buy cheap systems to do this because they don't want to spend a lot of money on something they only casually use?

Price matters to the average home PC user. Price matters a lot.


I completely disagree that the market doesn't exist, it just isn't tapped yet.

It has been tapped. Why do you think netbooks are so popular?


OSNews readers are not the intended audience, anyone who would be interested in this would be the fringe of what they are targeting.


I think Google have the right idea with ChromeOS
Asus had the right idea with netbook hardware.
But Apple have completely lost sight of reality with the Ipad.

Thus I think the Ipad's biggest market is really just gadget junkies with cash to burn.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: @haters
by google_ninja on Fri 29th Jan 2010 16:41 in reply to "RE: @haters"
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

So the future is less capable devices at inflated prices?!?


I was pretty shocked actually. Conductive screens are not cheap, and 500$ comes way under what I would expect something like this to cost.

At a guess: they Buy cheap systems to do this because they don't want to spend a lot of money on something they only casually use?

Price matters to the average home PC user. Price matters a lot.


Another 100$ for a machine with a great OS that "just works" and a really great touch screen isn't exactly the end of the world.

It has been tapped. Why do you think netbooks are so popular?


Netbooks are still using inappropriate operating systems for an "appliance" machine. Things are getting better (http://www.jolicloud.com/), but that is basically a cheap copy of the iPhone OS anyways.

I think Google have the right idea with ChromeOS
Asus had the right idea with netbook hardware.
But Apple have completely lost sight of reality with the Ipad.


Chrome OS does not cover things like watching movies or listening to / downloading music, because it is designed deliberately with no persistant storage in mind.

Thus I think the Ipad's biggest market is really just gadget junkies with cash to burn.


We'll see. Like I quoted before, http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=500. We have been through all this before; apple releases a consumer product, techies dont get it and think it is over priced and gimmicky, and it completely dominates the market, cause the market is not made up of techies.

Reply Parent Score: 2