Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Apple Yes, yes, I apologise. After Kroc's story earlier today, and together with this one, we now have three stories in a row on the Ipad iPad (sorry, I can't ban camel case from OSNews just yet). So, what are we going to do? Predictions? Criticism? More details? No - I want to explain what I think the differences are between the introduction of the iPod and the iPhone, and that of the iPad.
Thread beginning with comment 406649
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: @haters
by SReilly on Fri 29th Jan 2010 14:47 UTC in reply to "@haters"
SReilly
Member since:
2006-12-28

You have a very good point there. For us techies, such a device seems almost anathema considering how fast hardware and operating systems have advanced but for the average home user, a device like this is perfect.

My girlfriend has a user account on my custom built PC and I can tell you, the PC is a screamer. The only thing she uses her account for is web browsing (including email and watching TV shows), the odd text document or spread sheet and the odd bit of either skype or IM. While watching her computer usage habits, she would never use more than about 10% of systems resources and the biggest slice of that %10 is taken up by flash.

A device like the iPad (how I hate that name!) would be exceptionally practical for her. Almost all of her data is stored on the net (I refuse to say cloud ;-) so local storage needs are kept to a minimum. She uses one application at a time and doesn't require four gigs of ram or an SLi rig as the only games she ever plays are card games like solitaire.

I do think there is a market for low powered tablets and if anybody can market the concept, surely it's Apple.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: @haters
by google_ninja on Fri 29th Jan 2010 15:30 in reply to "RE: @haters"
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

Its not only power though, its what the machine is capable of, and all the things that are available on the internet.

At home, I use my computer to
- read industry news
- play games
- program
- record and edit music
- watch tv/movies
- manage my various devices (iphone/ipod/e-reader)
- play around with virtualized operating systems
- experiment with apps and platforms I am not familiar with


My wife uses her computer to
- facebook
- youtube
- look at cute animal pictures
- IM
- watch tv/movies

Thats it. Thats what the iPad does (yeah, the name sucks), it does it well, it does it easily, and it does it with style. Not only that, but throw in 3g, and you don't even have to worry about ISPs or routers or anything like that. And finally, it is at a price comparable to a laptop.

I don't see how this cannot be huge. about 90% of tech bloggers seem to completely miss the point, but that shows more how out of touch they are then anything else (remember this? http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=500) What people here need to realize is that they are a niche audience, things that are popular with them will probably never be mainstream in any significant way.

Edited 2010-01-29 15:31 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: @haters
by SReilly on Fri 29th Jan 2010 16:50 in reply to "RE[2]: @haters"
SReilly Member since:
2006-12-28

I absolutely agree, though I'd like to clarify that what I mean by low powered also includes long battery life. The one thing I use my netbook for is exactly what my girlfriend would use the iPad for but instead of having to deal with the complex environment that is a Linux distribution (even if it's Ubuntu), she could use a completely integrated environment with a minimum amount of setup and maintenance.

Sure, the lock-in would drive me mad but as you quite rightly pointed out, I'm a consumer of a niche market. Hell, I build my own systems because I want them to be just so.

What do you think about Adobe porting Flash to the iPad? Do they already have an ARM port?

Reply Parent Score: 2