Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Apple Yes, yes, I apologise. After Kroc's story earlier today, and together with this one, we now have three stories in a row on the Ipad iPad (sorry, I can't ban camel case from OSNews just yet). So, what are we going to do? Predictions? Criticism? More details? No - I want to explain what I think the differences are between the introduction of the iPod and the iPhone, and that of the iPad.
Thread beginning with comment 406661
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: @haters
by google_ninja on Fri 29th Jan 2010 16:41 UTC in reply to "RE: @haters"
google_ninja
Member since:
2006-02-05

So the future is less capable devices at inflated prices?!?


I was pretty shocked actually. Conductive screens are not cheap, and 500$ comes way under what I would expect something like this to cost.

At a guess: they Buy cheap systems to do this because they don't want to spend a lot of money on something they only casually use?

Price matters to the average home PC user. Price matters a lot.


Another 100$ for a machine with a great OS that "just works" and a really great touch screen isn't exactly the end of the world.

It has been tapped. Why do you think netbooks are so popular?


Netbooks are still using inappropriate operating systems for an "appliance" machine. Things are getting better (http://www.jolicloud.com/), but that is basically a cheap copy of the iPhone OS anyways.

I think Google have the right idea with ChromeOS
Asus had the right idea with netbook hardware.
But Apple have completely lost sight of reality with the Ipad.


Chrome OS does not cover things like watching movies or listening to / downloading music, because it is designed deliberately with no persistant storage in mind.

Thus I think the Ipad's biggest market is really just gadget junkies with cash to burn.


We'll see. Like I quoted before, http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=500. We have been through all this before; apple releases a consumer product, techies dont get it and think it is over priced and gimmicky, and it completely dominates the market, cause the market is not made up of techies.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: @haters
by boldingd on Fri 29th Jan 2010 18:46 in reply to "RE[2]: @haters"
boldingd Member since:
2009-02-19

People have also pointed out the Cube (which I actually bought) and the apple TV appliance. It's equally true that Apple can fail completely.

In my view, this thing is a purely secondary device. Sure, it's cool, and people will want it, if for no other reason than it's coolness-factor. I can even believe it will sell in at least modest numbers. But I highly, highly doubt that it's going to "dominate the market." It very much remains to be seen if people will shell out $500 at the entry-level for a device that's purely supplementary (and that doesn't really do anything their computer and TV don't already do anyway).

I mean, hell, like Thom said, people already knew they liked portable music players and smart phones, and there where already markets for such things; it's much less clear that people have been wanting a tablet-like device, and it's highly doubtful that huge numbers of people will be willing to pay the price Apple's asking for one.

Edited 2010-01-29 18:47 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2