Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Apple Yes, yes, I apologise. After Kroc's story earlier today, and together with this one, we now have three stories in a row on the Ipad iPad (sorry, I can't ban camel case from OSNews just yet). So, what are we going to do? Predictions? Criticism? More details? No - I want to explain what I think the differences are between the introduction of the iPod and the iPhone, and that of the iPad.
Thread beginning with comment 406686
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: @haters
by boldingd on Fri 29th Jan 2010 18:46 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: @haters"
boldingd
Member since:
2009-02-19

People have also pointed out the Cube (which I actually bought) and the apple TV appliance. It's equally true that Apple can fail completely.

In my view, this thing is a purely secondary device. Sure, it's cool, and people will want it, if for no other reason than it's coolness-factor. I can even believe it will sell in at least modest numbers. But I highly, highly doubt that it's going to "dominate the market." It very much remains to be seen if people will shell out $500 at the entry-level for a device that's purely supplementary (and that doesn't really do anything their computer and TV don't already do anyway).

I mean, hell, like Thom said, people already knew they liked portable music players and smart phones, and there where already markets for such things; it's much less clear that people have been wanting a tablet-like device, and it's highly doubtful that huge numbers of people will be willing to pay the price Apple's asking for one.

Edited 2010-01-29 18:47 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2