Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 31st Jan 2010 14:20 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 407053
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Patently absurd
by Thom_Holwerda on Sun 31st Jan 2010 16:07
in reply to "RE: Patently absurd"
even as screwed up as the U.S legal system is that wouldn't fly... at least not yet
A system that could award millions in damages for downloading a few mp3s is also capable of granting damages when a mere user inadvertently consumes h24 content without a license.
Edited 2010-01-31 16:07 UTC
RE[3]: Patently absurd
by modmans2ndcoming on Sun 31st Jan 2010 16:16
in reply to "RE[2]: Patently absurd"
"even as screwed up as the U.S legal system is that wouldn't fly... at least not yet
A system that could award millions in damages for downloading a few mp3s is also capable of granting damages when a mere user inadvertently consumes h24 content without a license. "
Could you please point to just 1 case where the person got fined millions of dollars for downloading?? What color is the sky in your world??





Member since:
2008-07-15
Of course, we're all supposed to know if a video we're watching is properly licensed. Didn't you know?
I don't think they'd actually get away with going after an end user, even as screwed up as the U.S legal system is that wouldn't fly... at least not yet. Still, the fact that they're allowed to put that condition in there speaks volumes about what a lot of lawyers are up to these days. Scary thought, isn't it?