To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ogg was designed for streaming. Specifically, it was designed for streaming radio using Vorbis. It's worked properly for years, including storing the length of a stream without having to read the whole file.
Perhaps you're thinking of AVI, which stores a separate index at the end of the file. That certainly can't be streamed (easily) without reading the beginning and end of the file.
Perhaps you're thinking of AVI, which stores a separate index at the end of the file. That certainly can't be streamed (easily) without reading the beginning and end of the file.
1.) Learn to read. I never wrote that Firefox needs to download the whole file, just the beginning and the end.
2.) No, I'm not confusing Ogg with AVI.
To Quote Christopher Blizzard from Mozilla:
http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/12/autobuffering-video-in-firefox/
I get the feeling you've never had to write code that uses GStreamer.
By many peoples' standards, it's not mature and not only do the devs have an over-inflated view of its quality, they threw a tantrum when "once burned, twice shy" KDE wrote Phonon with the original intent of it being an API wrapper for GStreamer to ensure API stability for the entire KDE 4.x release cycle.
Here's one of the places where I read about the original reasoning behind Phonon: http://lwn.net/Articles/183462/
Unfortunately, I was only able to find that because I remember it being on LWN. I can't get Google to narrow things down enough to find the other two or three which cemented my view of GStreamer developers as immature and with too much ego. (I think it was a post-reply conversation between KDE and GStreamer dev blogs)
By many peoples' standards, it's not mature and not only do the devs have an over-inflated view of its quality
That doesn't change the fact that:
1.) Songbird is using GStreamer and Mozilla could share the workload with the Songbird team.
2.) Mozilla is using GStreamer for Firefox Mobile (aka. Fennec): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422540
So why should Mozilla support LibPlayOgg on desktop and then support a separate back-end for Fennec if Mozilla could just as well use the same code for both?





Member since:
2005-07-06
That's bullsh*t. Mozilla had no problems adopting Ogg Theora, even though it was hardly usable for streaming when Mozilla adopted it. Firefox needs to download the beginning and the end of an Ogg Theora file, because it hasn't even a length info in the file header. How braindead is that?
BTW, it still doesn't change the fact that by adopting GStreamer right from the start, Mozilla would've gotten Dirac support for free.