Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 31st Jan 2010 14:20 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 407158
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Sure they decide, but end users also have to use a licensed product. You'd start to see websites stating that they only worked with safari or chrome. It is possible...but so very silly, it would be the second coming of "site designed for internet explorer"
At this time, Vimeo have started an experiment to supply video via html5, but only using h264 decoder. This will ONLY work in Safari and Chrome, not Firefox.
Despite the fact that Firefox is a few times more prevalent that Chrome and Safari combined, in a recent announcement Vimeo still somehow made the obviously-incorrect claim that using h264 lets them get video to more clients.
Clearly, in order to get open video on the web, users simply cannot leave this decision up to providers who are so obviously willing to lie.
Clearly users will have to start demanding open web video (HTML5/Theora) before we get anywhere with this.




Member since:
2008-03-17
Sure they decide, but end users also have to use a licensed product. You'd start to see websites stating that they only worked with safari or chrome. It is possible...but so very silly, it would be the second coming of "site designed for internet explorer"