Linked by Adam S on Mon 1st Feb 2010 18:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 407306
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I wouldn’t say it was boring, just simply the meeting of all Apple’s capabilities in one device.
iPhone OS, aluminium engineering, battery technology, PA Semi, webkit. Design.
Having met two regular, non-geek Mac users today, I can see easily how the iPad is going to change everything. _Only_ geeks get the full power and use out of Mac OS X.
I wouldn’t say it was boring, just simply the meeting of all Apple’s capabilities in one device.
iPhone OS, aluminium engineering, battery technology, PA Semi, webkit. Design.
Having met two regular, non-geek Mac users today, I can see easily how the iPad is going to change everything. _Only_ geeks get the full power and use out of Mac OS X.
iPhone OS, aluminium engineering, battery technology, PA Semi, webkit. Design.
Having met two regular, non-geek Mac users today, I can see easily how the iPad is going to change everything. _Only_ geeks get the full power and use out of Mac OS X.
Its a logical progression I agree, but everyone always gets more excited about disruptive innovations rather than incremental evolutionary stuff. And given the amount of hype behind anything apple does everyone was hoping for a disruptive change even if what we actually got was fairly logical. The iPad ended up being not so different from what we saw a CES just a couple weeks before, in many areas apple was being the me too guy for once. At least for tech geeks who follow this stuff, the average person may be surprised about Apple's 'innovation'.





Member since:
2005-04-01
Sadly, you're right.